Drunken Driving -- to the “Durkee”
Law guards the mystery of booze
Already “legislative initiatives have been prepared,” said Viktor Nilov, chief traffic inspector of the Russian Federation. Insurers will surely be satisfied: greater income loomed - statements by fans who considered other people's money went through the media. And they even began to share them: let, they say, insurance companies put in profits for bonuses to model-abstained drivers.
The Za rulyom. RF correspondent asked about profits directly from an informed representative of the “workshop” - head of the methodology department of AlfaStrakhovanie Denis Makarov.
“For now, we consider our obvious costs,” the source said. - If the draft law is approved, it will be necessary to supplement the policy with a “drunk” paragraph - it should include a justification for the cost of compulsory motor liability insurance. Operating expenses for system re-adjustment will increase - making changes to the databases, additional administration, notification, staff training, etc. This is expensive.
It will be necessary to find out whether the buyer has insurance "alcoholic past." Depending on the severity of the deed in the past: one price is for a “one-time” violator, another is for the system one. Obtaining and processing data is additional work, which means, again, expenses. Not cheap: it is necessary to study the "dossier" of each driver when concluding contracts, - Denis Makarov concluded the "monetary" part of the conversation and switched to the civilian one.
Drunken Driving -- to the “Durkee”
“Tariffs” of the GAI are higher than the paying capacity of drivers
- What should be the increasing factors? CTP prices are not taken from the ceiling: this is mathematics, it is based on statistics. Not sure if it reflects reality. Everyone knows that when talking with traffic inspectors, a lot of those who are foolishly sharply sober up. On the other hand, I believe that the number of police protocols has ceased to decline, statistics are not improving because the "tariffs" of traffic cops exceeded the solvency of drivers.
Only hardly the traffic police bill will pass. The “drunken” dossier of drivers belongs to the category of his personal data, and they, like the diagnosis of the disease, are not legally available to anyone without the sanction of a citizen or law enforcement officers, but only in special cases known to everyone. Will we change the Constitution?..
And in principle, the question itself is vicious,”the expert concluded. - An opportunity is offered to drive drunk while driving, but for more money. Lawmakers must understand this! As well as the fact that with our insurance culture, the increase in the cost of compulsory motor liability insurance will not bring results.
According to the diagnosis of the police
For the eternally drunk chaos driving, really, there are not too strict measures - we agree with Viktor Nilov. Therefore, his proposal to introduce “medical support for persons repeatedly detained for management while intoxicated” does not seem too strict.
But as if in the final version, the word "repeatedly" did not disappear. The fear is not far-fetched: we recognized the reckless categorization of power with the introduction of a zero threshold for alcohol in the blood of drivers, and then with "deafness" to objections to this matter, based on undeniable data from scientists. “The stricter the better” has become the core of the traffic police policy in the application of fines.
Drunken Driving -- to the “Durkee”
If without the word “repeatedly”, any delinquent can be sent, like inveterate drunks, to compulsory treatment (how else to understand the words “medical support” ?!). And by the will of the police, not the court. We don’t confuse anything, this is how the official source quoted police lieutenant general Viktor Nilov: “Legislative initiatives have been prepared that provide for the provision of powers to the traffic police …”. Inadvertently, parallels arise with the unforgettable era, when psychiatrists in civilian clothes determined the madhouse.
For life?
The “soft” option is to be registered with drug dispensaries (ND). Violators, "chronicles" there and the road. But if this happens - an example from life?
Just a little “relaxed” in the country, a motorist, already sleeping, tore off the bell about a misfortune with a loved one in the city. On the way, he was deprived of his rights. We will not discuss whether it is fair or not: although you can’t call a taxi into the village in the dead of night, and you didn’t have a driver’s neighbor, you can’t drink to the wheel anyway.
If a citizen is made a patient of ND, after serving his sentence, he will go for a certificate from a narcologist, and he will put the stamp: “Registered”. The rights to drive a car can not be restored. Never in my life? Or is there an “amnesty”? What are the dates and grounds, general.
Drunken Driving -- to the “Durkee”
You have the right to an opinion
The head of the traffic police made it clear that additions to the anti-alcohol order are under discussion. Get involved in it now (on our forum): it will be difficult to fix. Especially if the provisions formulate and adopt amendments without you. The editors will bring your opinion to the STSI.
- Do you agree that the increased tariff for compulsory motor liability insurance will have an effect?
- Do you consider the introduction of “medical escort” correct for repeatedly guilty people?
- If so, what is the period of "medical support" to punish? What criteria determine the punishment?
- In each case, should the traffic police or the court establish a punishment? Or should the gradation of punishments be prescribed in law?
