Mitsubishi outlander
Mitsubishi Outlander 3.0 Ultimate 4WD: 1, 479, 000 Mitsubishi Outlander 3.0 Ultimate 4WD: 1, 479, 000
Mitsubishi outlander
How is the Outlander 3.0 different from the 2.4-liter (170 hp) version, except for power and engine capacity? In the "economic" aspect - at a price. In similar trim Instyle and Ultimate, he is 100 000 rubles. expensive. Transport tax is also higher: in Moscow, for example, instead of 6460, you will have to pay as much as 16, 725 rubles. in year. And fuel consumption per 100 km more: in the city - by 2.5, on the highway - by 0.5, and in the combined cycle - by 1.3 liters.
Mitsubishi outlander
Petrol V6 (3.0 L) - the most powerful engine possible. Petrol V6 (3.0 L) - the most powerful engine possible.
Mitsubishi outlander
He is entitled to a freer (2-pipe) exhaust. He is entitled to a freer (2-pipe) exhaust.
What in return? Acceleration to 100 km / h is minus 1.1 s and top speed is plus 10 km / h.
Mitsubishi outlander
Mitsubishi outlander
The most expensive version of Ultimate keyless engine start and access to the car In the most expensive version of Ultimate keyless engine start and access to the car
And also emotions. Already pleasant are such trifles as the V6 nameplate on the front wings or a pair of exhaust pipes instead of one. And on the go? Instead of the variator, a hydromechanical “automatic machine” works in tandem with a 3-liter engine. Moreover, a modern, 6-band, with manual mode and the ability to shift gears with a selector or shift paddles. Thanks to the “automatic” and higher torque of the V6 engine (284 N.m at 3750 rpm versus 232 at 4100 at version 2.4), acceleration resembles an inevitable avalanche movement with a distinct change in tone and nods of the tachometer needle. In general, everything is “natural”, and 2.4 liters with a variator are given “synthetics” …
Mitsubishi outlander
Total
Andrey Kochetov
In our "turbocharging and variator-rotorized" century, an atmospheric engine of "adult" volume and even with a hydromechanical "automatic machine" is becoming a rarity. Unreasonably and irrationally, you see! Well, let. And for me it is a “live” sound, as for rock musicians who still prefer tube amplifiers to semiconductor ones. Let the efficiency be lower, but the voice at the output is more natural …
Andrey Kochetov, editor
